Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD in Cultural Policy-making, Head of the Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Think Tank of Resistance Literature in Hozeh Honari, Tehran, Iran

2 MA in Persian Language and Literature, Head of the Department of Islamic Revolution Literature, Think Tank of Resistance Lliterature in Hozeh Honari, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The scientific pathology of resistance literature research is one of the necessities of this field, which can be useful in identifying scientific problems and weaknesses and achieving research-oriented solutions and policies in this field.
The research method of this study was exploratory. Information was collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with eleven professors and experts, and thematic analysis method and MaxQuda software were used to analyze them.
The categories extracted from the perspective of the interviewees about problem analysis in resistance literature include: separation of question and problem in scientific researches; The conflict between the mind and the object as the origin of the formation of the problem; Formation of the problem free from bias and resistance; authenticating the scientific method; Updating issues in the field of resistance literature and in-depth insight into them.
   
Damages in the field of research in two levels of scientific and research damages; And structural and organizational damages were investigated.
To solve the problems at both levels, solutions were presented by the interviewees, among which the following can be mentioned:
Determining policies, guidelines, and road map; Identifying strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats through fundamental research and situational assessment; Forming an information bank and networking of activists and those interested in this field; Expanding national and international communication by holding a conference.

Keywords

Aghanouri, N. & Gholamhosseinzadeh, Gh. (2016). «Statistical analysis - approach of researches in the field of resistance literature from the beginning to the end of 2019». Journal of resistance literature of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, 8th year, 15th issue: 1-29.
Aghanouri, N. (2016). «Fallacuses", "confiscations" and "false challenges": the main obstacles in research in the field of resistance literature», Literary criticism, Q9, No. 36: 7-39.
Adib Haj Bagheri, M. & Parvizi. S. & Salsali. M. (2007). Qualitative research methods, Tehran: Boshra.
Amenkhani, I. (2017). «The authority of theory in contemporary literary researches; (A pathological view of the relationship between text and theory in theory-oriented researches) ». Literary Review, No. 38: 97-120.
Amiri Khorasani, A. & Farrokhnia, M. (2018). Basics of writing and research. Kerman: Shahid Bahoner University of Kerman. First Edition.
Bagheri, L. & Sangri, F. (2023). «A pathological look at resistance literature researches from the perspective of Persian language and literature professors». The Quarterly Journal of Informatization and Informatics, and the resistance of Islamic Revolution Art Field. No. 6: 52-61.
Blakey, N. (2005). Social research design. Translated by Hasan Chavoshian. Tehran: Ney.
Dayani, M. H. (2010). The method of expressing and explaining the problem in research. Mashhad: Computer Library Publications.
Etamadi Far, S. M. & Azimi, A. (2019). « Recognizing the social issues of the Iran-Iraq war in Iranian plays ». Examining Iran's social issues. Tenth period, second issue: 55-80.
Ekramifar, M. (2010). Research and thesis writing guide, Tehran: Foundation for the preservation and publication of sacred defense values.
Emarati Moghaddam, D. (2009). «The Crisis of Criticism: The Collision of Theory and Text». Literary Criticism Quarterly, Q2, No. 8: 215-219.
Faramarz Qaramelki, A. (2004). Principles and techniques of research in the field of religious studies. Qom: Qom Seminary.
Farhanghi, S. (2009). «An interdisciplinary approach in literary research». Under the guidance of Dr. Mohammad Reza Yousefpour. Ph. D. Dissertation, Persian Language and Literature, Gilan University.
Flick, U. (2008). Introduction to qualitative research method. Translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran :Ney publication.
Ghaboul, Ehsan (2011). «Methodology of Literary Research (along with methodological criticism and analysis of selected doctoral theses in the field of Persian language and literature)». Under the guidance of Dr. Mohammad Ali Gholami-Najad. Doctora thesis of Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
Hafez Nia, M. R. (2014). An introduction to research methods in humanities. Tehran: Side.
Heydari, M.R. (2020). «Review and evaluation of articles published in the field of Persian literature from scientific and research journals of Persian literature in the period from 2012 to 2018». Under the guidance of Dr. Saeed Ghafari. Master's thesis in the field of information science and philology, majoring in public library studies, Payam Noor University, Qom branch.
Homan, H. A. (2006). Practical Guide to Qualitative Research. First Edition. Tehran: Organization for Studying and Compiling Humanities Books of Universities (Samt).
Jamshidi, F. & Kamari, A. (2019). Three views: to some issues in the three fields of culture, narrative and war research. Tehran: Sooreh Mehr Publishing Company.
Mohammadi Kalehsari, A. (2016). «The place of hypothesis in literary research». Journal of Literary Criticism, No. 34: 7-32.
Raz, A. (2015). «Analysis of research approaches in literary articles of scientific-research magazines of the 1980s in Iran». Under the guidance of Dr. Ahmad Razi. Doctoral dissertation on Persian language and literature, University of Gilan.
Razi, A.. (2012). «Problem-oriented literary studies in literary studies». Literary Techniques, fourth year, number 1 (sequential 6): 13-26.
Rezvanian, Q. & Kiyani Barforushi, H. (2018). «Criticism and analysis of the scientific nature of literary research based on the critical evaluation of research method books in Persian literature». Critical research journal of humanities texts and programs, 18th year, number 2: 113-140.
Sangri, F. & Bagheri, L. (2023). «Ten looks: Research in the opinion of ten professors», Quarterly Journal of Informatization and Informatics, Andishehnameh of the resistance of the Hozeh Honari, No. 6: 19-51.
Sangri, F. & Bagheri. L. (2023). «Permanence of resistance literature depends on literary research: a conversation with Dr. Ahmad Khatami». Quarterly Journal of Informatization and Informatics, Andishehnameh of the resistance of the Hozeh Honari, No. 6: 8-17.
Sarmad, Z.&  Bazargan. A. & Hejazi. E. (1997). Research methods in behavioral sciences. Tehran: Ad.
Wafaei, A. A. (2009). Does and don'ts in the field of Persian language and literature (Collection of conference papers 2016). Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University Press.
 
References [In English]:
Kuzel, A.J. (1999). Samplinging Qualitative Inquiry, in Crabtree, B. F. & L. Miller, W. L. (Eds), Doing Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gray, David E., (2004), Doing Research in the Real World, SAGE publication
Shamsher, A. M. (2004), University Research Activities in Bangladesh, Bangladesh Vision 2021, Bangladesh Academy of Sciences.
 Sekar J. John (2019). «Is there a Method/Methodology for Literary Research?». Conference Paper. March 2015:1-10. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337112003